[Brazil - cover page] [Title Page] [List of Genera][Comparison of Drawings] [Regional Keys to Genera] [Geographical Distribution] [Color Photographs] [Scanning Microphotographs] See also Catalogue of Salticidae [ Title page] List of Genera - names beginning with: A BC DEFG HIJKL MN OPQ RS TUVWXYZ References: Authors beginning with: A BC DEFG HIJKL MN OPQ RS TUVWXYZ [See also Catalogue of Salticidae]

List of photographs of species of Salticidae (Araneae) of Brazil

Salticidae (Araneae) from Brazil:
Central Amazonia

photographic documentation

Thierry Gasnier* Jerzy Proszynski ** Gustavo Rodrigo Sanches Ruiz ***
Bruno Machado * Aline Cássia Kramer da Silva *

* Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas. 690Brazil.
** Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, ul. Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa. Poland.
*** Instituto Butantã, de São Paulo. Brazil.

Foreword

One of the most important challenges in contemporary biology is to document faunal and floral diversity of endangered natural environments, before they will disappear. Unfortunately scientific establishment is poorly prepared to execute such task. There are organized actions to collect species from still existing rich environments, but because lack of trained taxonomists, they end usually in museum collections, to be forgotten and gradually decay. There are museum collections of spiders already 100 years old, with specimens half macerated and discolored, still not identified. But also identified collections, including descriptive type specimens, are fading and decaying, even before they are sufficiently analyzed,.
The problem lies in training of specialists in taxonomy for particular groups, which takes not years but dozens of years, and shortage of financial support for training, employment and research. So the number of taxonomists, which was never adequate for the task, is decreasing rapidly, with no replacement available.
Partial solution could be invention of easy methods of documenting diversity of species by collections of photographs stored on computer disks and available through Internet, illustrating spiders in a way, which would permit future identification, classification and description. If successful, that could allow study of fauna by relatively smaller number of specialists, even resident far away; facilitate training of students, and spread knowledge of fauna. Such documentation, after methods will be developed and tested, and the experience gained, could be prepared routinely by field collectors, even students participating in ecology field courses, students writing their course diplomas and PhD theses.
So we are particularly grateful to Dr Thierry Gasnier, his collaborators and students from Depto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil, and from Instituto Butantã, de São Paulo, for undertaking the present seminal project of photographing fauna of Salticidae of Brazil. One can wish that their example could be followed by researchers conducting faunal study of environments in other endangered areas.
This presentation is at the moment in initial stages of preparation. The number of species is small, a lot of species is not identified and/or named, and those identified need checks and corrections, sexes are not matched. The quality of photographs is being gradually improved, and replaced by improved ones. However, we decided to show our program now, to illustrate methods for those who can be interested in following the lead.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jerzy Prószynski.


Introdution

[A Virtual Interactive Museum of Jumping Spiders (Salticidae: Araneae) of Central Amazonia: application of a 
new paradigm for collection of arthropods
by:
     Thierry R. Gasnier * , Jerzy Proszynski **, Gustavo Rodrigo Sanches Ruiz ***,  Bruno Machado *, Aline Cássia Kramer da Silva **      
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas; 
** Museum and      Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences. u. Wilcza 64, Warszawa,  POLAND;
 *** Instituto Butantã, de São Paulo]

Amazonia is not an immense uniform forest area; distant places with the same kind of ecosystem have significant differences in the composition of the fauna and flora. Even in short excursions to the field, it is not surprising that a few new species are found, specially in the case of arthropods. The study of the distribution of species in Amazonia is important to comprehend the ecological history of the region, processes that contributed to its high biodiversity, to establish bases for politics of conservation and strategies for sustainable development (Overal 2001) and for discovering bioindicators of environmental quality (Parisi 1979, Stork & Eggleton 1992).

However, the identification of species is an arduous work in an region with extremely high biodiversity. The taxonomists are few, overloaded, and generally have to be specialized in few genera. The identification of the material of a single field trip by a non specialist researcher is almost impossible in the present situation in many group of arthropods. Identifications in genus level are of limited value, and even genus may be difficult to be established for some families. The efficiency of survey of species in this situation may take a time too long for the necessity of data that we have now. All the work of identification can not be left only to the hands of the overloaded taxonomists. Some preliminary analysis done by non specialists are necessary to increase the velocity of surveys.

The use of Internet for the publication online of guides for identifications is growing very fast in the last years. For example, the National Institute for Biodiversity in Costa Rica has a long term project to help researches with the identification local species of arthropods, with keys already available for Formicidae (Hymenoptera), Tettigoniidae (Orthoptera), Phoridae (Diptera), Hispinae (Coleoptera), Amblypygi (Arachnida), Oribatida (Arachnida) and Odonata (http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/ ALAS/ALAS.html). There are many advantages of online publications 1) Information become worldwide accessible almost for free, very fast, and may include a large number of color photographs; 2) Information may be changed to correct errors, or to correct names after revisions of genera, or bad photos may be replaced by better photos; 3) The site may be interactive, i. e. visitors of the site of the publication may inform the necessity of the corrections; 4) Researchers may "visit" collections deposited in museums or research institutions without the need of going there, and decreasing the necessity to manipulate specimens when it is not necessary; 5) New species and unidentified species may be presented to the scientific community as a morphotype. There are also some disadvantages: 1) The guides are so accessible that precipitate researchers may be tempted to consider them as a substitute to the need to consult specialists. It has to be stressed that the identifications in a guide should be considered preliminary, except if species types were photographed, or under rules that may be established by the scientific community; 2) The virtual guide tend to be less permanent than a physical publication deposited in libraries. However, there is nothing that prevent that a virtual publication becomes latter a published paper, and there may be found other forms to transform it in a more permanent publication; 3) A specimen published in Internet could be described by anyone. It is not our propose to evaluate if this would be or not an ethical procedure, but this could happen. Therefore, those interested in describing a species should avoid presenting it in internet.

Arachnids in general, and spiders in particular were intensively studied in Amazonia in term of surveys of species (Adis 2002, Brescovit et al. 2002; Bonaldo et al. no prelo), and it is a promising group to be used as bioindicator of environment quality and in studies of the ecological history of the region based on the distribution of species (Overal 2001). Due to the extremely high Amazon biodivertity, there is still a big deal of work to be done (Adis 2002).

Salticidae is possibly the family richest in species in Neotropical forests. Among the spiders collected by Nentwig (1993) in Panama, 26,7% belonged to this family, more than the double than the second richest family. This is a megadiverse group, easy to be collected, but hard to be studied because of the difficult identification. Even the identification of genera is extremely complex because of the lack of keys for identification, and due to the incomplete knowledge of the tropical jumping spiders.

However, some recent publications may reduce this limitation for the studies with Salticidae. The taxonomic situation of the family evolved after the study of the relationships among genera made by Maddison & Hedin (2003). Proszynsky (2003, 2005) published the site where this text is written in Internet, with designs from the papers with the description of many species of the family. We pretend to furnish another contribution for those interested in working with this family in central Amazonia. Although most identifications were done by specialists that worked in the collection of INPA (Intituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia), we emphasize that they should be considered preliminary.


Methods

The material presented here includes photographs of different quality, some from a preliminary phase when they were taken for our personal use and other after we developed the technique and a pattern including more details and angles. Therefore, the techniques and patterns that we present here are those used mostly for a more advanced phase of our work. We

The photos were taken adjusting a digital camera with a small diameter of (lente) (about xxx) to a dissecting microscope. This adjust is easy with many different cameras to many different microscopes. (Explain with photos.)

We dropped alcohol gel in the middle of a small dry Petri Dish of glass, immersed the specimen in it, and we positioned the spider in the exact position that we wanted. Then, we completed the Petri dish with clean liquid alcohol 70% (para evitar reflexos do gel). After some photos in each position (to choose the better focus latter in the computer), it is possible to change the position some times before the need to change the alcohol gel.

A complete photo set includes the following angles: dorsal, ventral, dorso-lateral, frontal, epigynum and it’s preparation (dorsal and, if possible ventral), many angles of the palp, with and without the …, and sometimes a detail of the chelicerae.

The label of the photo had: 1) a changeable part, an abbreviation of the preliminary identification, which was important to organize the specimens in the genera and species, and 2) a fix part, to allow us to find the photos of the specimen after eventual changes or (melhoras) in the identification.

Example:
SAL_Acr_min#+%tged01_01 is:
SAL= Salticidae
Acr= Acragas
min= mineaceus
#= ? (doubt); (##= ?? serious doubt)
+= male (- = female)
%= separator
tg= abbeviation of a register book deposited in INPAs collection
e= 5th letter of the alphabet= 2005
d= 4th letter of the alphabet= April
01= 1st specimen taken in April 2005
_01= 1st photo of this specimen

All spiders here have labels with a fix part in the end. The fix part pattern with only 6 characters for a specimen was adopted only for a few of the last photos, when we realized that short labels reflecting the sequence of photos are much more practical. However, we present it as a suggestion for future works. Information on place of collection, or who collected may be in a file and in a register book deposited in a collection. They should not be part of a label.



Acknowledgements


Hubert Höfer collected and organized most Salticidae in INPA´s collections. Heiko, made most of the identifications in INPA´s collection. Without their work we would not be able to start ours. Felippe Rego teached us how to use alcohol gel to make easier to position the spiders for the photos. Antonio Brescovit… We dedicate this photographic registration to the memory of … for her vast work on Salticidae of South America.


As fotografias serão feitas por câmaras digitais com diâmetro da lente compatível com microscópios (técnica comum dominada pela equipe) e iluminação com lâmpadas frias (<65oC) de 20W (equivalente a 120-150W). O posicionamento de aranhas pequenas e de estruturas será feita em álcool gel, submerso em álcool líquido para evitar reflexos em placas de Petri, ou coberto com lamínula quando usadas lâminas escavadas, pelo mesmo motivo. Quando necessário, será feita a diafanização de estruturas com ácido lático e a expanção dos palpos com hidróxido de potássio (KOH 10%) (Brescovit et al. 2002). Os especialistas convidados participarão de forma mais intensiva durante as visitas, mas acompanharão o trabalho ao longo do projeto.

                                                                                                                                Thierry R. Gasnier 


Bibliography

     Adis, J. 2002. Taxonomical Classification and Biodiversity. Pp 13-16. In Adis,      J. (ed.) Amazonian Arachnida and Myriapoda. Pensoft. Sofia. 589 p.
     Bonaldo, A. B., Brescovit, A. D., Höfer, H., Gasnier, T. R. & A. A. Lise (No Prelo). A Araneofauna 
     (Arachnida, Araneae) da Reserva Florestal Adolfo Ducke, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil.
     Brescovit, A. D., Bonaldo, A. B., Bertani, R. & Rheims, C. A. (2002).Araneae. In: Adis, J. (ed.). Amazonian 
     Arachnida and Miriapoda. Pensoft. Sofia. 589p.
     Gasnier, T., Höfer, H. & Brescovit, A. D. 1995. Factors affecting the "activity-density" of spiders on tree
     trunks in an Amazonian rainforest. Ecotropica, 1(2). 
     Gasnier, T. R. 1996. Ecologia comparada de quatro espécies de aranhas errantes do gênero Ctenus (Walckenaer)
    (Araneae, Ctenidae) em uma floresta na Amazônia Central: Bases para um modelo integrado de coexistência. 
     Tese de Doutorado, UA/INPA/CAPES. Manaus. 77pp.
     Gasnier, T. R. & H. Höfer. 2001. Patterns of abundance of four species of wandering spiders (Ctenidae, Ctenus)
     in a forest in central Amazonia. Journal of Arachnology. 29:95-103
     Gasnier, T. R., Azevedo, C. S. de, Torres-Sanchez, M. P. & H. Höfer.(2002). Adult size of eight wandering spider
     species in central Amazonia: Temporal variations and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Arachnology 30:146-154.
     Gasnier, T. R. & J. Proszynsky. 2005 (sítio em construção)<http://localhost/salticid/sal-braz.htm>
     Höfer, H. & Beck, L. 1995. Die Spinnentierfauna des Regenwaldreservats "Reserva Ducke " in Zentralamazonien 
     I. Natur und Museum, 125(12): 389-401. 
     Höfer, H., Brescovit, A. D., Adis, J. & Paarmann, W. (1994): The spider fauna of Neotropical tree canopies 
     in Central Amazonia. First Results. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 29(1): 23-32. 
     Höfer, H. (1996): Araneae. In: W. J. Junk (ed.): The central Amazonian river floodplains. Ecology of a 
     pulsing system. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 
     Höfer, H. (1997): The spider communities. 19:373-383. In: W. J. Junk (ed.): The central Amazonian river
     floodplains. Ecology of a pulsing system. Ecological Studies, Vol. 126, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 
     Höfer, H. & Brescovit, A. D. Species and guild structure of Neotropical spider assemblage (Araneae) from 
     Reserva Ducke, Amazonas, Brasil. Andrias,      15: 99-119.
     Maddison, W. P. & Hedin, M. C. Jumping spiders phylogeny (Araneae: Salticidae). Invertebrate Systematics
     57:529-549.
     Metznet H. 2005.< http://www.salticidae.de> 
     Netwig, N. 1993. Spiders of Panama.Sandhill Crane. Leiden, The Netherlans.274p.
     Overal, W. L. 2001. O peso dos invertebrados na balança da conservação biológica da Amazônia. Pp 50-59. 
     In Capobianco, J. P. R., A. Moreira, A. Sawyerr, D., dos Santos, Iza & L. P. Pinto (orgs) Biodiversidade
     na Amazônia Brasileira: Avaliação e ações prioritárias para a conservação, uso sustentável e repartição
     de benefícios. Instituto Socioambiental/ Estação Liberdade. São Paulo.
     Parisi, V. 1979. Biología y Ecologia del Suelo. Blume. Barcelona. 169p.
     Proszynski, J. 2003 version 2005. Salticidae (Araneae) of the World. <http://www.miiz.waw.pl/salticid/main.htm>.      
     Proszynski, J. 2005. Global Species Database of Salticidae (Araneae). <http://www.gsd-salt.miiz.waw.pl/
     Stork, N. E. & Eggleton, P. 1992. Invertebrates as determinants and as indicators of soil quality. American 
     Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7: 23-31.
     Salvestrini, F. M. D. & T. R. Gasnier. 2001. Differences in the activity of juveniles, females and males of 
     two hunting spiders of the genus Ctenus (Araneae, Ctenidae): Active males or inactive females? Journal of 
     Arachnology. Journal of Aracnology 29:276-278.
     Torres-Sanchez, M. P. 2000. Padrões espaciais de abundância, ciclo reprodutivo e variação de tamanho de
     adultos de Phoneutria fera Perty e Phoneutria reidyi F. O. Pickard-Cambridge (Araneae, Ctenidae)na Reserva
     Florestal Adolpho Ducke, Amazonas, Brasil. Dissertação de mestrado, UA/INPA/CNPq. Manaus, 86pp.